0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±Þ¼ºÅëÁõ°ü¸® °£È£»ç ÁÖµµÀÇ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ÅëÁõ°ü¸® ÇöȲ

Postoperative Pain Management Status led by an Advanced Practice Nurse of Acute Pain Service

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2020³â 26±Ç 3È£ p.296 ~ 304
KMID : 1004620200260030296
°­¹Ì¶ó ( Kang Mi-Ra ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing

·ùÁ¤¿Á ( Ryu Jeong-Ok ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing
±è¸íÈñ ( Kim Myung-Hee ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing
À±Çý½Å ( Yun Hea-Shin ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing
±ÇÁ¤¼ø ( Kwon Jeong-Soon ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised Acute Pain Service (APS)¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °ü¸®µÈ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ÅëÁõ°ü¸® ÇöȲÀÇ °´°üÀûÀÎ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» ÀÔÁõÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: 2017³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 12¿ù±îÁö Á¤¸Æ ÀÚ°¡ÅëÁõÁ¶Àý±â(PCA)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ È¯ÀÚ 5,748¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀû ¼­¼úÀû Á¶»ç¿¬±¸¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇß´Ù. µ¥ÀÌÅÍ´Â ±â¼úÅë°è, ºóµµºÐ¼®, ANOVA, ±³Â÷ºÐ¼®°ú x^2 test, »ó°üºÐ¼®À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: APS °£È£»çÀÇ ±³À°Àϼö°¡ ±æ¾îÁú¼ö·Ï PCA »ç¿ë±â°£Àº Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ±æ¾îÁ³°í, PCA¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â µµÁß¿¡ Áß´ÜÇÏ´Â ±â°£Àº À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Âª¾ÆÁ³´Ù(p<.001). Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¡Àå ÅëÁõÀÌ ½ÉÇß´ø ¼ö¼úÀº »çÁö, ôÃß, »óº¹ºÎ, Èä°û ¼ö¼úÀ̾ú°í, ¹Ý¸é¿¡ °¡Àå ÅëÁõÀÌ ÀûÀº ¼ö¼úÀº ÇϺ¹ºÎ ¼ö¼úÀ̾ú´Ù(p<.001). ÇϺ¹ºÎ ¼ö¼úÀÌ PCA »ç¿ë·®ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í(p<.001), »çÁö¿Í ôÃß ¼ö¼úÀº PCA¸¦ °¡Àå Àû°Ô »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç PCA »ç¿ëÀ» ÀÚÁÖ Áß´ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<.001). °¡Àå ÈçÇÑ ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀº ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿À½É°ú ±¸Åä¿´À¸¸ç ¹ß»ý·üÀº 24½Ã°£ À̳» 16.0%, 48½Ã°£ À̳» 9.8%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. PCA·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß»ýµÈ Àüü ¿À·ù´Â 1.5%¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌ Áß 84.3%´Â ÀÎÀû ¿À·ù¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: APS °£È£»çÀÇ ÅëÁõ°ü¸® È¿°ú·Î ȯÀÚµéÀÌ PCA¸¦ ´õ¿í È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼±Çà ¿¬±¸µé¿¡ ºñÇØ ºÎÀÛ¿ëµµ Àû¾ú°í ¿À·ù ¹ß»ý·üµµ Àû¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°í ÅëÁõ °ü¸®¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀ̶ó°í Á¦¾ÈÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ú´Ù.

Purpose: This study was conducted to demonstrate objective stability of postoperative pain management status managed by nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised Acute Pain Service (APS).

Methods: A retrospective descriptive review was conducted with 5,748 patients who had used intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) from January to December 2017. Data were analyzed using descriptive statics, Frequency analysis, ANOVA, Cross tabulation with x2test, and Correlation coefficient.

Results: As the APS nurse's education date increased, the period of using PCA was statistically significantly longer, and the period of stopping PCA while using it became shorter (p<.001). Statistically significant, the most painful operations were extremities, spine, upper abdomen, and thorax, while the least painful surgery was lower abdomen (p<.001). Lower abdominal surgery used the highest amount of PCA (p<.001), and extremities and spinal surgery, the lowest amount of PCA and frequently stop using it (p<.001). The most common side effects were nausea and vomiting after surgery, with an incidence of 16.0% within 24 hours and 9.8% within 48 hours. The overall error caused by PCA was 1.5%, with 84.3% being caused by human errors.

Conclusion: With the pain management effect of APS nurses, patients used PCA more effectively. There were also fewer side effects and error rates compared to prior studies. Therefore, it is suggested that this system is safe and effective for pain management.
KeyWords
±Þ¼ºÅëÁõ°ü¸®, ¼ö¼ú, ÅëÁõ°ü¸®, °£È£»ç
Acute Pain Service, Surgery, Pain Management, Nurse
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)